• The Core Journal of China
  • Included in Chinese Science Citation Database
  • The Key Magazine of China technology
  • Frontrunner 5000—Top Articles in Outstanding S&T Journals of China
  • Included in Scopus
  • Included in Chemical Abstracts (CA)
  • Included in Russian Abstract Journal (AJ)
Advanced Search
Chen Wudi, Liu Xiaohuang, Li Hongyu, Sun Xingli, Wang Yugang, Liu Xiaojie, Xing Liyuan, Wang Ran, Luo Xinping, Wang Chao, Zhao Honghui. 2024. Ecosystem service function and security pattern of Tianshan Mountains in Xinjiang from 1990 to 2050[J]. Geology in China, 51(5): 1644−1663. DOI: 10.12029/gc20231121001
Citation: Chen Wudi, Liu Xiaohuang, Li Hongyu, Sun Xingli, Wang Yugang, Liu Xiaojie, Xing Liyuan, Wang Ran, Luo Xinping, Wang Chao, Zhao Honghui. 2024. Ecosystem service function and security pattern of Tianshan Mountains in Xinjiang from 1990 to 2050[J]. Geology in China, 51(5): 1644−1663. DOI: 10.12029/gc20231121001

Ecosystem service function and security pattern of Tianshan Mountains in Xinjiang from 1990 to 2050

Funds: Supported by the Third Xinjiang Scientific Expedition Program (No. 2022xjkk090405, No. 2021xjkk140104) and the project of China Geological Survey (No. DD20230514).
More Information
  • Author Bio:

    CHEN Wudi, male, born in 2000, master candidate, mainly engaged in resources and environment, natural resources observation research; E-mail: 1830708775@qq.com

  • Corresponding author:

    LIU Xiaohuang, male, born in 1972, professor lever senior engineer, mainly engaged in natural resources observation research; E-mail: liuxh19972004@163.com.

  • Received Date: November 20, 2023
  • Revised Date: February 16, 2024
  • This paper is the result of ecological geological survey engineering.

    Objective 

    Under the background of global climate change and the continuous expansion of human activities, natural ecosystems and their service functions are facing increasingly serious threats and recessions.In order to address this challenge, it is critical to identify and protect key sites that are of great value to ecological sustainability. Ecological security pattern refers to a comprehensive strategy and method to ensure regional ecological sustainability.

    Methods 

    Based on the In−VEST model, PLUS model and circuit theory, this study evaluated the dynamic changes of ecosystem services and ecological security pattern (ESP) in the Tianshan Mountains in the arid region of Northwest China.

    Results 

    The spatial distribution of land use type (LUCC) was basically stable from 1990 to 2050. In the past 30 years, the total conversion area was 32.52×103 km2, which was mainly the conversion between wasteland and grassland. Compared with 2020, the total land conversion areas under the scenarios of Natural development scenario (ND), Ecological protection scenario (EP) and Urban development scenario (UD) in 2050 are 21.43×103 km2, 23.09×103 km2 and 22.87×103 km2, respectively. Among them, the net increase of forest land area is the most, which is mainly transformed from grassland. The area of forest land, grassland and water body increased under EP scenario. In the other two scenarios, the area of construction land and cultivated land has expanded significantly. Compared with ND and UD scenarios, the ecosystem service function of EP scenario is greater. There are obvious spatial differences in ESP in the Tianshan Mountains from 1990 to 2050. The larger ecological sources and smaller resistance corridors are mainly distributed in the central and northern parts of the Tianshan Mountains with higher ecosystem service functions. On the contrary, broken ecological sources and large resistance corridors are mostly distributed in the western region blocked by sand, bare land or mountains. The southeast is a desert area, with no ecological source and lack of ecological corridors. In the past 30 years, the area of ecological source area has decreased by 1.84×103 km2, showing a trend of fragmentation, and the ecological network is more complex. Compared with 2020, the area of ecological source and pinch point under EP scenario in 2050 will increase by 10.53×103 km2 and 0.11×103 km2 respectively, and the area of ecological barrier zone will decrease by 0.38×103 km2. In addition to the EP scenario, the ecological source area of the other two scenarios also increased, but lower than the EP scenario.

    Conclusions 

    Ecological protection scenarios play a vital role in shaping LUCC and are of great significance for maintaining ecological security and ecosystem integrity.

    Highlights
    (1) Constructing ecological sources and resistance surfaces by quantifying past and future ecosystem services. (2) Simulating the future land use types and constructing the ecological security pattern under different scenarios in 2050. (3) Revealing the dynamic change characteristics of ecological security pattern in different periods of Tianshan Mountains from 1990 to 2050.
  • [1]
    Adriaensen F, Chardon J P, De Blust G, Swinnen E, Villalba S, Gulinck H, Matthysen E. 2003. The application of 'least−cost' modelling as a functional landscape model[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64(4): 233−247. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00242-6
    [2]
    Beier P, Majka D R, Spencer W D. 2008. Forks in the road: Choices in procedures for designing wildland linkages[J]. Conservation Biology, 22(4): 836−851. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00942.x
    [3]
    Cao Jiajie, Fu Jianwei. 2023. Research on the construction method of urban green space habitat network based on InVEST model and Least–cost path: A case study of Nanjing[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 39(1): 53−58 (in Chinese with English abstract).
    [4]
    Carroll C, Roberts D R, Michalak J L, Lawler J J, Nielsen S E, Stralberg D, Hamann A, Mcrae B H, Wang T L. 2017. Scale–dependent complementarity of climatic velocity and environmental diversity for identifying priority areas for conservation under climate change[J]. Global Change Biology, 23(11): 4508−4520. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13679
    [5]
    Chen Y, Li W, Deng H, Fang G, Li Z. 2016. Changes in central Asia’s water tower: Past, present and future[J]. Scientific Reports, 6(1): 35458. doi: 10.1038/srep35458
    [6]
    Cook B I, Mankin J S, Marvel K, Williams A P, Smerdon J E, Anchukaitis K J. 2020. Twenty−first century drought projections in the CMIP6 forcing scenarios[J]. Earths Future, 8(6): e2019EF001461. doi: 10.1029/2019EF001461
    [7]
    Dai Lu, Liu Yaobin, Huang Kaizhong. 2020. Construction of an ecological security network for waterfront cities based on MCR model and DO index: A case study of Jiujiang City[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 75(11): 2459−2474 (in Chinese with English abstract).
    [8]
    Dong J Q, Peng J, Xu Z H, Liu Y X, Wang X Y, Li B. 2021. Integrating regional and interregional approaches to identify ecological security patterns[J]. Landscape Ecology, 36(7): 2151−2164. doi: 10.1007/s10980-021-01233-7
    [9]
    FAO, IIASA. 2021. China Soil Map Based Harmonized World Soil Database (HWSD) (v1.1) (2009) [M].
    [10]
    Fu Yujia, Tan Changhai, Liu Xiaohuang, Sun Xingli, Yuan Zemin, Zheng Yiwen. 2022. Definition, classification, observation and monitoring of natural resourcesand their application in territorial planning and governance[J]. Geology in China, 49(4): 1048−1063 (in Chinese with English abstract).
    [11]
    Gao J B, Du F J, Zuo L Y, Jiang Y. 2021. Integrating ecosystem services and rocky desertification into identification of karst ecological security pattern[J]. Landscape Ecology, 36(7): 2113−2133. doi: 10.1007/s10980-020-01100-x
    [12]
    Gao M W, Hu Y C, Bai Y P. 2022. Construction of ecological security pattern in national land space from the perspective of the community of life in mountain, water, forest, field, lake and grass: A case study in Guangxi Hechi, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 139: 108867. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108867
    [13]
    Gerten D, Rockström J, Heinke J, Steffen W, Richardson K, Cornell S. 2015. Response to comment on "Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet"[J]. Science, 348(6240): 1217.
    [14]
    Gong J Z, Liu Y S, Xia B C, Zhao G W. 2009. Urban ecological security assessment and forecasting, based on a cellular automata model: A case study of Guangzhou, China[J]. Ecological Modelling, 220(24): 3612−3620. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.10.018
    [15]
    Groombridge B, Jenkins M. 2000. Global Biodiversity: Earth’s living resources in the 21st Century[C]//: Cambridge, UK: World Conservation Press, 2000
    [16]
    Guo F, Liu X, Mamat Z, Zhang W, Xing L, Wang R, Luo X, Wang C, Zhao H. 2023. Analysis of spatiotemporal variations and influencing factors of soil erosion in the Jiangnan Hills red soil zone, China[J]. Heliyon, 9(9): e19998. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19998
    [17]
    Han Wangya, Xia Shuangshuang, Zhou Wei, Shen Yu, Su Xukun, Liu Guohua. 2023. Constructing ecological security pattern based on ecological corridoridentification in Lhasa River Basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 43(21): 8948−8957 (in Chinese with English abstract).
    [18]
    Han Zongwei, Jiao Sheng, Hu Liang, Yang Yumin, Cai Qing, Li Bei, Zhou Min. 2019. Construction of ecological security pattern based on coordination between corridors and sources in national territorial space[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 34(10): 2244−2256 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20191019
    [19]
    Hu Ruji. 2004. Natural Geography of Tianshan Mountains, China [M]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press(in Chinese with English abstract).
    [20]
    Huang K X, Peng L, Wang X H, Deng W. 2022. Integrating circuit theory and landscape pattern index to identify and optimize ecological networks: A case study of the Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(44): 66874−66887. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20383-y
    [21]
    Huang L Y, Wang J, Fang Y, Zhai T L, Cheng H. 2021. An integrated approach towards spatial identification of restored and conserved priority areas of ecological network for implementation planning in metropolitan region[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 69: 102865. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102865
    [22]
    Kang J M, Zhang X, Zhu X W, Zhang B L. 2021. Ecological security pattern: A new idea for balancing regional development and ecological protection. A case study of the Jiaodong Peninsula, China[J]. Global Ecology and Conservation, 26: e01472. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01472
    [23]
    Ke X L, Wang X Y, Guo H X, Yang C, Zhou Q, Mougharbel A. 2021. Urban ecological security evaluation and spatial correlation researchbased on data analysis of 16 cities in Hubei Province of China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 311: 127613. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127613
    [24]
    Li M Y, Liang D, Xia J, Song J X, Cheng D D, Wu J T, Cao Y L, Sun H T, Li Q. 2021. Evaluation of water conservation function of Danjiang River Basin in Qinling Mountains, China based on InVEST model[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 286: 112212. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112212
    [25]
    Li Q, Zhou Y, Yi S Q. 2022. An integrated approach to constructing ecological security patterns and identifying ecological restoration and protection areas: A case study of Jingmen, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 137: 108723. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108723
    [26]
    Li Y G, Liu W, Feng Q, Zhu M, Yang L S, Zhang J T, Yin X W. 2023. The role of land use change in affecting ecosystem services and the ecological security pattern of the Hexi Regions, Northwest China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 855: 158940. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158940
    [27]
    Li Z T, Li M, Xia B C. 2020. Spatio–temporal dynamics of ecological security pattern of the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration based on LUCC simulation[J]. Ecological Indicators, 114: 106319. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106319
    [28]
    Liang X, Guan Q F, Clarke K C, Liu S S, Wang B Y, Yao Y. 2021. Understanding the drivers of sustainable land expansion using a patch–generating land use simulation (PLUS) model: A case study in Wuhan, China[J]. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 85: 101569. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101569
    [29]
    Liu Z H, Huang Q D, Tang G P. 2021. Identification of urban flight corridors for migratory birds in the coastal regions of Shenzhen City based on three–dimensional landscapes[J]. Landscape Ecology, 36(7): 2043−2057. doi: 10.1007/s10980-020-01032-6
    [30]
    Lu F, Hu H F, Sun W J, Zhu J J, Liu G B, Zhou W M, Zhang Q F, Shi P L, Liu X P, Wu X, Zhang L, Wei X H, Dai L M, Zhang K R, Sun Y R, Xue S, Zhang W J, Xiong D P, Deng L, Liu B J, Zhou L, Zhang C, Zheng X, Cao J S, Huang Y, He N P, Zhou G Y, Bai Y F, Xie Z Q, Tang Z Y, Wu B F, Fang J Y, Liu G H, Yu G R. 2018. Effects of national ecological restoration projects on carbon sequestration in China from 2001 to 2010[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(16): 4039−4044.
    [31]
    Lu Y, Xiaoliang X, Jicai L, Xiaohua F, Luyuan L. 2022. Research on the spatio–temporal variation of carbon storage in the Xinjiang Tianshan Mountains based on the InVEST model[J]. Arid Zone Research, 39(6): 1896−1906.
    [32]
    McRae B H, Dickson B G, Keitt T H, Shah V B. 2008. Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation[J]. Ecology, 89(10): 2712−2724. doi: 10.1890/07-1861.1
    [33]
    Pan Jinghu, Li Lei. 2021. Optimization of ecological security pattern in Gansu section of the Yellow River Basin using OWA and circuit model[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 37(3): 259−268 (in Chinese with English abstract).
    [34]
    Peng J, Yang Y, Liu Y X, Hu Y N, Du Y Y, Meersmans J, Qiu S J. 2018. Linking ecosystem services and circuit theory to identify ecological security patterns[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 644: 781−790. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.292
    [35]
    Peng Jian, Li Huilei, Liu Yanxu, Hu Yina, Yang Yang. 2018. Identification and optimization of ecological security pattern in Xiong'an New Area[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73(4): 701−710 (in Chinese with English abstract).
    [36]
    Peng Jian, Zhao Huijuan, Liu Yanxu, Wu Jiansheng. 2017. Research progress and prospect on regional ecological security pattern construction[J]. Geographical Research, 36(3): 407−419 (in Chinese with English abstract).
    [37]
    Peng S. 2024a. 1–km Monthly Mean Temperature Dataset for China (1901–2023) [M]. National Tibetan Plateau Data Center.
    [38]
    Peng S. 2024b. 1–km Monthly Precipitation Dataset for China (1901–2023) [M]. National Tibetan Plateau Data Center.
    [39]
    Proctor M F, Nielsen S E, Kasworm W F, Servheen C, Radandt T G, Machutchon A G, Boyce M S. 2015. Grizzly bear connectivity map in the Canada–United States trans−border region[J]. Journal of Wildlife Management, 79(4): 544−558.
    [40]
    Reheman·Rukeya, Kasim·Alim, Ablat·Halmu–rat, Duolat·Xilinayi, Xu Jinhua. 2022. Research on the temporal and spatial evolution of habitat quality in urban agglomeration on the northern slope of Tianshan Mountains based on InVEST Model[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 38(9): 1112−1121 (in Chinese with English abstract).
    [41]
    Sharp R, Tallis H, Ricketts T, Guerry A D, Wood S A, Chaplin–Kramer R, Nelson E, Ennaanay D, Wolny S, Olwero N 2016. InVEST+ VERSION+ User’s Guide. The Natural Capital Project [M]. Stanford University, University of Minnesota, The Nature Conservancy, and World Wildlife Fund.
    [42]
    Spear S F, Balkenhol N, Fortin M J, Mcrae B H, Scribner K. 2010. Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: Considerations for parameterization and analysis[J]. Molecular Ecology, 19(17): 3576−3591. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04657.x
    [43]
    Sun Zhangtao, Yu Zhengwei, Shu Siqi, Xu Chuangsheng, Shuyang. 2023. Evaluation of ecosystem services of Chinese provincial land and suggestions for ecological geological survey[J]. Geology in China, 50(2): 479−494 (in Chinese with English abstract).
    [44]
    Wang J, Chen Y Q, Shao X M, Zhang Y Y, Cao Y G. 2012. Land–use changes and policy dimension driving forces in China: Present, trend and future[J]. Land Use Policy, 29(4): 737−749. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.11.010
    [45]
    Wen J F, Hou K. 2021. Research on the progress of regional ecological security evaluation and optimization of its common limitations[J]. Ecological Indicators, 127: 107797. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107797
    [46]
    Wang Luchen, Han Haihui, Zhang Jun, Huang Jiao, Gu Xiaofan, Chang Liang, Dong Jiaqiu, Long Rui, Wang Qian, Yang Bingchao. 2024. Spatio–temporal evolution of land use and human activity intensity in the Tarim River Basin, Xinjiang [J]. Geology in China, 51(1): 203–220(in Chinese with English abstract).
    [47]
    Wang Xiaoyu, Chen Tianqian, Feng Zhe, Wu Kening, Lin Qian. 2020. Construction of ecological security pattern based on boundary analysis: A case study on Jiangsu Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40(10): 3375−3384 (in Chinese with English abstract).
    [48]
    Wei Baojing, Su Jie, Hu Xijun, Xu Kaiheng, Zhu Manle, Liu Luyun. 2022. Comprehensive identification of eco–corridors and eco–nodes based onprinciple of hydrological analysis and Linkage Mapper[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 42(7): 2995−3009 (in Chinese with English abstract).
    [49]
    Xia C H, Hu Z C, Xi C, Ming C W. 2008. The new methodology of geomorphologic zonalization in Xinjiang based on geographical grid [J]. Geographical Research, (3): 481–492, 725–726.
    [50]
    Xiao Duning, Chen Wenbo, Guo Fuliang. 2002. On the basic concepts and contents of ecological security[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 13(3): 354−358 (in Chinese with English abstract).
    [51]
    Xu Wenqiang, Yang Liao, Chen Xi, Gao Yaqi, Wang Lei. 2016. Carbon storage, spatial distribution and the influence factors in Tianshan forests[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 40(4): 364−373 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0235
    [52]
    Youcun L, Keqin J, Kui Z, Yan L, Tianding H, Yu Z. 2017. The response of precipitation to global climate change in the Tianshan Mountains, China[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 39(4): 748−759.
    [53]
    Yu Menglin, Liu Pinghui, Zhu Chuanmin. 2022. Construction of ecological security network based on minimum cumulative resistance model at Ningbo City[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 42(1): 217−224 (in Chinese with English abstract).
    [54]
    Yu Zhilin, Zhao Mingsong, Gao Yingfeng, Wang Tao, Zhao Zhidong, Wang Shihang. 2024. Spatio–temporal evolution and prediction of carbon storage in Huaibei City based on InVEST–PLUS Model[J]. Environmental Science, 45(6): 1−21 (in Chinese with English abstract).
    [55]
    Yuan J L, Liu X H, Li H Y, Wang R, Luo X P, Xing L Y, Wang C, Zhao H H. 2023. Assessment of spatial–temporal variations of soil erosion in Hulunbuir Plateau from 2000 to 2050[J]. Land, 12(6): 1214. doi: 10.3390/land12061214
    [56]
    Zhang D, Wang X, Qu L, Li S, Lin Y, Yao R, Zhou X, Li J. 2020. Land use/cover predictions incorporating ecological security for the Yangtze River Delta region, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 119: 106841. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106841
    [57]
    Zhang Mingdan, Li Yungang. 2023. Study on ecosystem service trade–off / synergy relationship in Ruili–Daying River Basin[J]. Study on Soil and Water Conservation, 30(6): 415−422 (in Chinese with English abstract).
    [58]
    Zhang S H, Zhong Q L, Cheng D L, Xu C B, Chang Y N, Lin Y Y, Li B Y. 2022. Landscape ecological risk projection based on the PLUS model under the localized shared socioeconomic pathways in the Fujian Delta region[J]. Ecological Indicators, 136: 108642. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108642
    [59]
    曹加杰, 傅剑玮. 2023. 基于InVEST模型和最小成本路径的城市绿色空间生境网络构建方法研究—以南京为例[J]. 中国园林, 39(1): 53−58.
    [60]
    戴璐, 刘耀彬, 黄开忠. 2020. 基于MCR模型和DO指数的九江滨水城市生态安全网络构建[J]. 地理学报, 75(11): 2459−2474. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202011014
    [61]
    付宇佳, 谭昌海, 刘晓煌, 孙兴丽, 袁泽民, 郑艺文. 2022. 自然资源定义、分类, 观测监测及其在国土规划治理中的应用[J]. 中国地质, 49(4): 1048−1063. doi: 10.12029/gc20220402
    [62]
    韩王亚, 夏双双, 周维, 申宇, 苏旭坤, 刘国华. 2023. 基于生态廊道识别的拉萨河流域生态安全格局构建[J]. 生态学报, 43(21): 8948−8957.
    [63]
    韩宗伟, 焦胜, 胡亮, 杨宇民, 蔡青, 黎贝, 周敏. 2019. 廊道与源地协调的国土空间生态安全格局构建[J]. 自然资源学报, 34(10): 2244−2256.
    [64]
    胡汝骥. 2004. 中国天山自然地理[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社.
    [65]
    潘竟虎, 李磊. 2021. 利用OWA和电路模型优化黄河流域甘肃段生态安全格局[J]. 农业工程学报, 37(3): 259−268. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2021.03.031
    [66]
    彭建, 李慧蕾, 刘焱序, 胡熠娜, 杨旸. 2018. 雄安新区生态安全格局识别与优化策略[J]. 地理学报, 73(4): 701−710. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201804009
    [67]
    彭建, 赵会娟, 刘焱序, 吴健生. 2017. 区域生态安全格局构建研究进展与展望[J]. 地理研究, 36(3): 407−419.
    [68]
    如克亚·热合曼, 阿里木江·卡斯木, 哈力木拉提·阿布来提, 希丽娜依·多来提, 许金花. 2022. 基于InVEST模型的天山北坡城市群生境质量时空演化研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 38(9): 1112−1121.
    [69]
    孙张涛, 余正伟, 舒思齐, 许闯胜, 舒阳. 2023. 中国省域生态系统服务价值评价与生态地质调查工作建议[J]. 中国地质, 50(2): 479−494.
    [70]
    王璐晨, 韩海辉, 张俊, 黄姣, 顾小凡, 常亮, 董佳秋, 龙睿, 王倩, 杨炳超. 2024. 塔里木河流域土地利用及人类活动强度的时空演化特征研究[J]. 中国地质, 51(1): 203–220.
    [71]
    王晓玉, 陈甜倩, 冯喆, 吴克宁, 林倩. 2020. 基于地类边界分析的江苏省生态安全格局构建[J]. 生态学报, 40(10): 3375−3384.
    [72]
    韦宝婧, 苏杰, 胡希军, 徐凯恒, 朱满乐, 刘路云. 2022. 基于“HY–LM”的生态廊道与生态节点综合识别研究[J]. 生态学报, 42(7): 2995−3009.
    [73]
    肖笃宁, 陈文波, 郭福良. 2002. 论生态安全的基本概念和研究内容[J]. 应用生态学报, 13(3): 354−358. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2002.03.024
    [74]
    许文强, 杨辽, 陈曦, 高亚琪, 王蕾. 2016. 天山森林生态系统碳储量格局及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 40(4): 364−373. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0235
    [75]
    于梦林, 刘平辉, 朱传民. 2022. 基于MCR模型的宁波市生态安全网络构建[J]. 水土保持通报, 42(1): 217−224. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-288X.2022.1.stbctb202201029
    [76]
    于芝琳, 赵明松, 高迎凤, 王涛, 赵治东, 王世航. 2024. 基于InVEST–PLUS模型的淮北市碳储量时空演变及预测[J]. 环境科学, 45(6): 1−21.
    [77]
    张铭丹, 李运刚. 2023. 瑞丽江–大盈江流域生态系统服务权衡与协同关系研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 30(6): 415−422.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 龚建涛,白艳军. 致密砂岩储层微观孔隙结构表征研究——以鄂尔多斯盆地东南部地区延长组为例. 地质与资源. 2024(05): 662-670 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article views (2110) PDF downloads (325) Cited by(1)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return