A study of structure and activity characteristics of the northern segment of Huangzhuang-Gaoliying fault in Beijing plain area
-
摘要:
黄庄-高丽营断裂是横穿北京市城区的一条规模较大的隐伏深大活动断裂，是北京凹陷和西山隆起的分界构造。本次研究工作区选在黄庄-高丽营断裂北段昌平未来科技城一带，对目标断裂先后开展了地震勘探、高密度电阻率法勘探以及槽探3种方法组合对其结构与活动性进行综合分析研究，查明了目标断裂的结构及其活动性。研究表明，黄庄-高丽营断裂由主断裂和次级断裂组成的断裂带，断裂带内次级断层也较为发育。断裂带在基岩中表现为阶梯状断层，向上延伸至第四系内部，形成“Y”字形断层组合。该断裂在全新世以来断裂活动明显，物探解译结果的上断点以及探槽中的现象均已达到地表。由此可见，本次工作所采用的3种物探方法组合，对探测城市隐伏断裂并探究其活动性，具有明显的效果，对减轻城市地震灾害实际应用评估具有十分重要的意义。
Abstract:Huangzhuang-Gaoliying fault is a relatively large buried active fault across Beijing urban area. It is the tectonic belt of Beijing depression and Xishan uplift. The study area is located in the Future Science and Technology City in Changping. In this paper, the authors analyzed the structure and activity of the fault with the methods of shallow seismic exploration, high density resistivity method and trench profile. The results show that Huangzhuang-Gaoliyang fault is a fault zone that consists of the major fault and secondary faults. The fault belt in bedrock is mainly manifested as step fault and extends up to Quaternary, being a "Y" fault combination. Research shows that this fault has been strongly active since Holocene. Thus, the combination of three methods of shallow seismic exploration, high-density electrical and trenches is significant for detecting the buried fault in the city and exploring its activity, and it is also very important in applying practical assessment to reducing urban seismic hazard.
-
1. 研究目的（Objective）
尼玛盆地构造上位于班公湖—怒江缝合带中部，是发育在侏罗系—白垩系海相地层之上的古近系陆相裂谷盆地，北接羌塘地块，南邻冈底斯地块，近东西向展布，面积约3000 km2。本次研究目的是初步查明尼玛盆地东部冻土发育特征，调查盆地东部古近系地层层序，获取古近系烃源岩、储盖层等关键评价参数，进一步评价盆地油气资源潜力。
结合新获取的大地电磁测深、地表地质调查及藏尼地1井资料，通过对盆地东部石油地质条件的进一步论证，中国地质调查局油气资源调查中心在盆地东部赛布错坳陷部署实施了藏双地1井，该井的实施对于西藏高原陆相盆地的油气勘探具有重要意义。
2. 研究方法（Methods）
通过资料的收集和重新处理解释，建立了尼玛盆地基础资料数据库，结合之前在尼玛盆地东部发现的油气显示带及最新的大地电磁测深和藏尼地1井资料，优选井位。藏双地1井完钻井深1206.78 m，全井段进行了取心、录井和测井，共有岩心407箱，岩心总长1108.88 m，收获率95.9%。在古近系牛堡组选取烃源岩样品进行地球化学分析测试，通过分析有机质丰度、有机质类型、热演化成熟度来评价烃源岩生烃潜力；使用荧光分析仪对岩石进行荧光分析，主要进行干照和滴照实验，来检测岩石、岩屑中的沥青、烃类等有机物质。
3. 结果（Results）
藏双地1井从上到下钻遇地层依次为第四系+ 新近系—牛堡组三段—牛堡组二段（未穿），气测录井有3处气测异常段，总烃最高为0.159%，岩性为棕红色粉砂岩、灰色细砂岩。含气量解析取样井段527.90~1206.78 m，共取样54个，现场解析在标准大气压下最高含气量为0.213 m3/t；共做浸水试验20个，拍摄视频20个，其中井深744.40 m、752.08 m、767.30 m、774.66 m、797.20 m、832.43 m均有气泡冒出，以井深752.08 m最为明显。
荧光录井井段0~1206.78 m，对全井岩心按设计逐包进行荧光直照、拍照、氯仿浸泡，定级；全井共录取荧光资料421个点，其中井深1024.23~1026.23 m牛二段灰绿色泥岩断面处，可见黑色薄膜状干沥青，具荧光显示，干照下呈黄色、淡黄色，产状为星点状、带状，用氯仿滴照可呈片状；井深1077.46~1077.76 m牛二段见油迹；井深1078.16~1078.76 m牛二段见点状干沥青；井深1078.76~1079.16 m牛二段层理间见油斑；井深1079.16~1080.16 m牛二段顶部断面处见油迹，都具有荧光显示，呈黄色、淡黄色，产状为星点状、带状（图 1）。
![]()
图 1 藏双地1井牛堡组二段录井柱状图及1079.16~1080.16 m油气显示Figure 1. Logging histogram and the oil and gas display in 1079.16-1080.16m of the second member of Niubao formation in Well Zangshuangdi 14. 结论（Conclusions）
（1）藏双地1井全井取心，获得了尼玛盆地东部古近系地层层序、烃源岩及储层等相关参数，分别在牛三段418.43~422.00 m、牛二段890.00~898.00 m及1068.16~1087.00 m发现3处气测异常段，总烃最高为0.159%，现场解析含气量值最大为0.213 m3/t，并在牛二段1077~1080 m处发现不同级别的油气显示，首次实现了尼玛盆地地下油气的重要发现，对盆地下一步的勘探部署具有重要意义。
（2）本井是继藏尼地1井后在西藏尼玛盆地部署实施的第2口地质调查井，通过对藏双地1井的钻井技术攻关，进一步总结出了适合高寒缺氧、地表及地下地质条件复杂的高原钻井施工工艺和设备参数，为下一步在该区钻井施工提供了重要的技术支撑。
尼玛盆地平均海拔近4800 m，由于其高海拔的特殊性，具有高寒缺氧、气候恶劣、生态脆弱等特征，在野外施工过程中与其他地区有着很大的不同，通过藏尼地1井、藏双地1井的钻探，克服了高寒条件下冻土发育钻井技术难题和高原缺氧条件下深井取心难题，基本形成了一套安全、环保、高效的作业技术体系，为高原地区的钻探施工工程积累了丰富的经验。
5. 致谢（Acknowledgement）
感谢李韬、李显亮等同志的交流和启发。
致谢: 感谢审稿专家提出的宝贵修改意见！ -
![]()
图 4 G1测线反演视电阻率断面图
Figure 4. The inversion figure of apparent resistivity of G1 survey line
![]()
图 5 G2测线反演视电阻率断面图
Figure 5. The inversion figure of apparent resistivity of G2 survey line
-
[1] 徐明才, 高景华, 刘建勋, 等.应用于城市活断层调查的地震方法技术[J].中国地震, 2005, 21(1):17-23. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGZD200501001.htm Xu Mingcai, Gao Jinghua, Liu Jianxun, et al.Application of the seismic method to detecting active faults[J].Earthquake Research in China, 2005, 21(1):17-23(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGZD200501001.htm
[2] 高文学, 马瑾.首都圈地震地质环境与地震灾害[M].北京:地震出版社, 1993. Gao Wenxue, Ma Jin.Seismo-Geological Background and Earthquake Hazard in Beijing Area[M].Beijing:Seismological Press, 1993(in Chinese).
[3] 徐锡伟, 吴为民, 张先康, 等.华北地区地壳最新构造变动与地震[M].北京:科学出版社, 2002. Xu Xiwei, Wu Weimin, Zhang Xiankang, et al.The Earth's Crust Tectonism and Earthquake in The Capital Area[M].Beijing:Science Press, 2002(in Chinese).
[4] 焦青, 邱泽华.北京平原区主要活动断裂研究进展[C]//地壳构造与地壳应力文集, 2006, 18:72-84. Jiao Qing, Qiu Zehua.Research Progress of Major Active Faults in Beijing Plain Area[C]//Crust Structure and Crust Stress Corpus.2006, 18:72-84(in Chinese).
[5] 北京市地质调查研究院.北京市多参数立体地质调查成果报告[D].2007. Beijing Institute of Geological Survey.Multiparameters 3-dimensional geological survey report in Beijing[D].2007(in Chinese).
[6] 车兆宏, 范燕.北京黄庄-高丽营断层、八宝山断层现今活动追踪研究[J].地震, 2008, 51(5):1503-1510. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZN200303013.htm Che Zhaohong, Fan Yan.Tracing study of fault activity of the Beijing Huangzhuang-Gaoliying fault and Babaoshan fault in recent time[J].Earthquake, 2008, 51(5):1503-1510(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DIZN200303013.htm
[7] 车兆宏.首都圈断层活动性研究[J].华北地震科学, 1993, 11(2):23-34. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDKD199302002.htm Che Zhaohong.A study of the fault activity in the capital circle[J].North China Earthquake Sciences, 1993, 11(2):23-34(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDKD199302002.htm
[8] 贾三满, 郭萌.从高丽营探槽分析黄庄-高丽营断裂与地裂缝的关系[J].城市地质, 2007, 2(4):24-28. http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/Article/CSDZ200704007.htm Jia Sanman, Guo Meng.The relation bewteen Hunagzhung-Gaoliying fualt and by Gaoliying trench and earth fissure[J].Urban Geology, 2007, 2(4):24-28(in Chinese with English abstract). http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/Article/CSDZ200704007.htm
[9] 尹功明, 卢演俦, 魏兰英, 等.北京高丽营断层时间年代学研究[J].地震地质, 2002, 24(1):101-110. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ200201009.htm Yin Gongming, Lu Yanchou, Wei Lanying, et al.Chronological study of faulting events of Gaoliying fault, Beijing[J].Seismology and Geology, 2002, 24(1):101-110(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ200201009.htm
[10] 向宏发, 方仲景, 张晚霞, 等.北京平原区隐伏断裂晚第四纪活动性的初步研究[J].地震学报, 1993, 15(5):385-388. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXB199303018.htm Xiang Hongfa, Fang Zhongjing, Zhang Wanxia, et al.Preliminary study of late Quaternary activities of concealed fractures in Beijing plain[J].Acta Seismologica Sinica, 1993, 15(5):385-388(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXB199303018.htm
[11] 张杰坤, 万志清, 陈奇, 等.北京地区北东向主要活动断裂的地震工程效应评价[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报, 1992, 3(2):16-25. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGDH199202002.htm Zhang Jiekun, Wan Zhiqing, Chen Qi, et al.Assessment of the seismic engineering effect of the main active faults along NE direction in Beijing district[J].The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 1992, 3(2):16-25(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGDH199202002.htm
[12] 徐杰, 汪良谋, 方仲景, 等.北京八宝山断裂和黄庄-高丽营断裂构造活动性的初步分析[J].华北地震科学, 1992, 10(3):1-11. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKXB200504011.htm Xu Jie, Wang Liangmou, Fang Zhongjing, et al.Preliminary analysis of the tectonic activities of Babaoshan and Huangzhuang-Gaoliying faults in Beijing area[J].North China Earthquake Sciences, 1992, 10(3):1-11(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKXB200504011.htm
[13] 江娃利, 候治华, 等.北京平原主要活动断裂全新世活动定量研究及未来地震危险性预测[C]地壳构造与地壳应力文集, 2000(13). Jiang Wali, Hou Zhihua, et al.Quantitative Study of Holocene Activity of Main Active Faults in the Beijing Plain and Prediction of Future Seismic Danger[C]//Crust Structure and Crust Stress Corpus, 2006(13)(in Chinese).
[14] 马文涛, 唐文榜, 徐锡伟等.北京市黄庄-高丽营隐伏断裂立水桥段浅层活动特征的地震探测[J].物探与化探, 2005, 29(6):503-505. http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/article/WTYH200506006.htm Ma Wentao, Tang Wenbang, Xu Xiwei, et al.Seismic exploration of shallow deformation along Lishuiqiao section of Huangzhuang-Gaoliying active fault in Beijing urban area.[J].Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2005, 29(6):503-505(in Chinese with English abstract). http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/article/WTYH200506006.htm
[15] 马文涛, 徐锡伟, 郝书俭, 等.北京市立水桥附近黄庄-高丽营隐伏断裂的浅层地震勘探[J].地震地质, 2004, 26(4):698-705. http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/Article/DZDZ200404014.htm Ma Wentao, Xu Xiwei, Hao Shujian, et al.Shallow seismic exploration for Huang Zhuang-Gaoliying buried fault in the vicinity of Lishuiqiao, Beijing[J].Seismology and Geology, 2004, 26(4):698-705(in Chinese with English abstract). http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/Article/DZDZ200404014.htm
[16] 白凌燕, 张磊, 蔡向民, 等.磁性地层年代对北京平原顺义断裂第四纪活动性的约束[J].现代地质, 2014(6):1234-1242. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201406013.htm Bai Lingyan, Zhang Lei, Cai Xiangmin, et al.Quaternary magnetostratigraphic time framework constraints on activity characteristics of the Shunyi fault, Beijing plain[J].Geoscience, 2014(6):1234-1242(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201406013.htm
[17] 张磊, 白凌燕, 蔡向民, 等.北京南口-孙河断裂北西段综合物探剖面定位及其活动性研究[J].现代地质, 2014(1):234-242. http://www.doc88.com/p-1364322356185.html Zhang Lei, Bai Lingyan, Cai Xiangmin, et al.Study on the positon of the north west section of the Nankou-Sunhe fault in Beijing and its activity[J].Geoscience, 2014(1):234-242(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.doc88.com/p-1364322356185.html
[18] 张磊, 白凌燕, 蔡向民, 等.北京平原南口-孙河断裂带北西段活动性分析[J].中国地质, 2014(3):902-911 http://geochina.cgs.gov.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20140317&flag=1 Zhang Lei, Bai Lingyan, Cai Xiangmin, et al.An analysis of the activity of the northwest part of Nankou-Sunhe fault[J].Geology in China, 2014(3):902-911(in Chinese with English abstract). http://geochina.cgs.gov.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20140317&flag=1
[19] 刘保金, 胡平, 孟勇奇, 等.北京地区地壳精细结构的深地震反射剖面探测研究[J].地球物理学报, 2009, 52(9):2264-2272. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX200909012.htm Liu Baojin, Hu Ping, Meng Yongqi, et al.Research on fine crustal structure using deep seismic reflection profile in Beijing region[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2009, 52(9):2264-2272(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX200909012.htm
[20] 高战武, 陈棋福, 黄金莉, 等.北京地区主要活动断裂深部速度结构特征及强震构造分析[J].震灾防御技术, 2010, 55(3):271-280. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZZFY201003000.htm Gao Zhanwu, Chen Qifu, Huang Jinli, et al.Velocity structure beneath the active faults in Beijing area and their seismo-tectonic characteristics[J].Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 2010, 5(3):271-280(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZZFY201003000.htm
[21] 向宏发, 方仲景, 贾三发, 等.隐伏断裂研究及其工程应用——以北京平原区为例[M], 北京:地震出版社, 1994:1-97. Xiang Hongfa, Fang Zhongjing, Jia Sanfa, et al.Study of the Buried Fault and its Application to Engineering Project——a Case Study of the Beijing[M].Seismological Press, 1994:1-97(in chinese).
[22] 向宏发.隐伏活动构造探测研究的若干问题讨论[J].地震地质, 2003, 25(3):460-466. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ200303010.htm Xiang Hongfa.Some problems in the exploration and research of buried active fault[J].Seismology and Geology, 2003, 25(3):460-466(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ200303010.htm
[23] 马文涛, 徐锡伟, 于贵华, 等.首都圈地区的地震活动性与断裂的关系[J].地震地质, 2004, 26(2):293-304. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ200402010.htm Ma Wentao, Xu Xiwei, Yu Guihua, et al.The relationship between seismic activity and fault activity in Beijing region[J].Seismology and Geology, 2004, 26(2):293-304(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ200402010.htm
[24] 胡平, 刘宝金, 白立新, 等.奥林匹克公园隐伏断裂综合探测[J].地球物理学报, 2010, 53(6):1486-1494. http://cpfd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CPFDTOTAL-DZDQ201101003214.htm Hu Ping, Liu Baojin, Bai Lixin, et al.Synthetic exploration of the buried faults in Olympic park area[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2010, 53(6):1486-1494(in Chinese with English abstract). http://cpfd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CPFDTOTAL-DZDQ201101003214.htm
[25] 常旭, 李林新, 刘伊克, 等.北京断陷黄庄-高丽营断层伪随机可控源地震剖面[J].地球物理学报, 2003, 23(3):97-103. http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/Article/DQWX200805025.htm Chang Xu, Li Linxin, Liu Yinke, et al.Seismic profile of Huangzhuang-Gaoliying fault in Beijing by Mini-sosie method[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2003, 23(3):97-103(in Chinese with English abstract). http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/Article/DQWX200805025.htm
[26] 白登海, 王立凤, 孙洁, 等.福州八一水库尚干断裂的高密度电法和瞬变电磁法试验探测[J].地震地质, 2003, 23(3):97-103. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ200204010.htm Bai Denghai, Wang Lifeng, Sun Jie, et al.DC and Tem test sounding for the Bayi ShuiKu-Shang Gan fault in Fuzhou city, Fujian Provice, China[J].Seismology and Geology, 2003, 23(3):97-103(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ200204010.htm
[27] 刘万恩.高密度电法探测基岩起伏和隐伏断裂中的应用[J].上海地质, 2007, 13(3):51-53. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHAD200703013.htm Liu Wanen.The application of exploring bedrock relief and embedded fracture via high-density resistivity method[J].Shanghai Geology, 2007, 13(3):51-53(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHAD200703013.htm
[28] 葛鸣, 邢立杰, 罗福忠, 等.高密度电法在和田隐伏断层探测中的应用[J].中国煤炭地质, 2014, 26(12):62-65. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGMT201412019.htm Ge Ming, Xing Lijie, Luo Fuzhong, et al.application of high density electric method in hidden fault prospecting, Hetian, Xinjiang[J].Coal Geology of China.2014, 26(12):62-65(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGMT201412019.htm
[29] 池跃龙, 张亭, 王星捷.高密度电法在探测隐伏断裂带中的应用[J].城市地质, 2014(3):44-46. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSDZ201403012.htm Chi Yuelong, Zhang Ting, Wang Xingjie.The Application of the high-density electrical method in detecting the underground faults[J].Urban Geology, 2014(3):44-46(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSDZ201403012.htm
[30] 刘艳春, 高树义, 庄明芳, 等.高密度电法在探测隐伏断裂中的应用[J].山西建筑, 2014, 40(30):89-91. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZSX201430046.htm Liu Yanchun, Gao Shuyi, Zhuang Mingfang, et al.Application of high-density resistivity method on detecting buried fault[J].Shanxi Architecture, 2014, 40(30):89-91(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZSX201430046.htm
[31] 侯治华, 钟南才, 郝彦军, 等.应用高密度电法探测北京南口-孙河隐伏断裂[J].防灾科技学院学报, 2011, 13(1):1-6. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKXB201102013.htm Hou Yehua, Zhong Nancai, Hao Yanjun, et al.Detecting Nankou-Sunhe buried faulty by high density resistivity method[J].Journal of Institute of Disaster-prevention Science and Technology, 2011, 13(1):1-6(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKXB201102013.htm
[32] 玄月, 王金萍, 冯军, 等.高密度电法在隐伏断裂探测中的应用[J].大地测量与地球动力学, 2011, 31(2):56-59. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKXB201102013.htm Xuan Yue, Wang Jinping, Feng Jun, et al.Application of highdensity resistivity method to buried fault exploration[J].Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics.2011, 31(2):56-59(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKXB201102013.htm
[33] 江娃利, 侯治华, 谢新生.北京平原南口-孙河断裂带昌平旧县探槽古地震事件研究[J].中国科学(D辑), 2001, 6(31):501-509. http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/article/JDXK200106008.htm Jiang Wali, Hou Zhihua, Xie Xinsheng.Research on paleoearthquakes in Jiuxian trenches across Nankou-Sunhe fault zone in Changping Country of Beijing plain[J].Scisence in China (Series D).2001, 6(31):501-509(in Chinese). http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/article/JDXK200106008.htm
[34] 赵勇, 蔡向民, 王继明, 等.北京平原构造断块划分及微断块第四纪活动性探讨[J].中国地质, 2015, 42(6):1876-1884. http://geochina.cgs.gov.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20150615&flag=1 Zhao Yong, Cai Xiang-min, Wang Ji-min, et al.The division of "small blocks" of structure in Beijing plain and a discussion on the activity of micro block in Quaternary period[J].Geology in China, 2015, 42(6):1876-1884(in Chinese with English abstract). http://geochina.cgs.gov.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20150615&flag=1
[35] 华伟, 陈廷东, 季红军, 等.高邮凹陷真武断裂带断层活动及演化规律[J].中国地质, 2012, 39(3):605-611. http://geochina.cgs.gov.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20120304&flag=1 Hua Wei, Chen Tingdong, Ji Hongjun, et al.Fault activity and evolution of the Zhenwu fault zone in Gaoyou sag[J].Geology in China, 2012, 39(3):605-611(in Chinese with English abstract). http://geochina.cgs.gov.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20120304&flag=1
-
期刊类型引用(8)
1. 张云，张天福，程先钰，孙立新，程银行，王少轶，王善博，马海林，鲁超. 鄂尔多斯盆地东北部侏罗纪含铀岩系三维地质结构与铀成矿规律浅析. 中国地质. 2022(01): 66-80 . 
本站查看
2. 庞康，吴柏林，孙涛，郝关清，雷安贵，杨松林，刘池阳，傅斌，权军明，王苗，郝欣，刘明义，李琪，张效瑞. 鄂尔多斯盆地砂岩型铀矿碳酸盐岩碳氧同位素及其天然气-水混合流体作用特征. 中国地质. 2022(05): 1571-1590 . 本站查看
3. 林兆民，张嘉冕. 甘肃省207铀矿及富铀岩体特征研究. 甘肃地质. 2022(04): 42-48 . 百度学术
4. Reng-an Yu，Shan-bo Wang，Qiang Zhu，Qing-hong Si，Xue-ming Teng，Xiao-xue Liu，Hou-ning Liu，Yong-xiang Tang. Zircon U-Pb ages and provenance characteristics of the Zhiluo Formation sandstones and the formation background of the uranium deposit in Huangling area, Ordos Basin, China. China Geology. 2021(04): 600-615 . 必应学术
5. 张天福，张云，金若时，俞礽安，孙立新，程银行，奥琮，马海林. 鄂尔多斯盆地东北缘侏罗系层序界面特征对砂岩型铀矿成矿环境的制约. 中国地质. 2020(02): 278-299 . 本站查看
6. 张云，张天福，孙立新，程银行，张祺，王少轶，程先钰，周小希. 鄂尔多斯盆地南缘黄陵地区煤铀兼探钻孔数据集成与三维地质模型构建. 中国地质. 2020(S1): 231-254 . 本站查看
7. 张天福，张云，程先钰，孙立新，程银行，周小希，王少轶，马海林，鲁超. 鄂尔多斯盆地北部东胜地区侏罗系-白垩系钻孔数据库与三维地质模型. 中国地质. 2020(S1): 220-245 . 本站查看
8. 田亮，赵天林，尹永朋，李名，叶阳. 内蒙古二连盆地额仁淖尔地区铀成矿水文地质条件分析. 矿产勘查. 2020(11): 2424-2429 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(0)
下载:
计量
- 文章访问数: 3743
- HTML全文浏览量: 528
- PDF下载量: 5852
- 被引次数: 8
